• Feed RSS
Showing posts with label Men. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Men. Show all posts
2
In his endless quest for different mediums and tools to express his creativity, the artist seeks the unconventional and the absurd. Some use animal carcasses while others, brass utensils. Pricasso uses his prick.
Are the paintings any good? Doesn't matter as long as you are newsworthy enough to be picked up by Reuters, it seems.

(Via)
0
Scott Adams points to an article which takes a new step forward in stating the obvious:
The smarter you are the less chicks you get to lay.

The more i think about it, what troubles me is not the lack of opportunities for born geniuses like me; what gets to my nerves is the relative lack of trouble that smarter women face. True, for getting the man of their dreams they may have to work on that hour glass figure or have plans to get rid of those braces. But for pure unadulterated sex they just need lower their standards. Men will swarm to them.

Sigh. The injustice of it all. Why oh why do they get to choose? Just because we have more numbers and hence they become a scarce commodity? If the answer is yes, then Babu Bajrangi and me may have a common cause now.
0
eMarketer informs us that Women outnumber men online. Anybody who has been into social networking for more than a week wouldn't have been surprised. You have droves upon droves of horribly bored, self righteous, arrogant, pseudo-profile creating girls there. And they dominate the market totally. It is maybe the girly thing to do. Go out and network. Talk trash. Participate in intellectual discussions about what you propose to do in Gandhiji ki dhoti. And loads of other mind racking puzzles. Including one where you prefix "In the bed" before your daily fortune's prophecy.

Considering that porn is no longer the most happening thing in Web 2.0 it was high time that the fairer sex took over.

Hopefully they will take the major part of the blame for the time that the world spends wilfing.
(link via Indiauncut.)
0
Michael Jordan having "retired," with $40 million in endorsements, makes $178,100 a day, working or not.

If he sleeps 7 hours a night, he makes $52,000 every night while visions of sugarplums dance in his head.

If he goes to see a movie, it'll cost him $7.00, but he'll make $18,550 while he's there.

If he decides to have a 5-minute egg, he'll make $618 while boiling it.

He makes $7,415/hr more than minimum wage.

He'll make $3,710 while watching each episode of Friends.

If he wanted to save up for a new Acura NSX ($90,000) it would take him a whole 12 hours.

If someone were to hand him his salary and endorsement money, they would have to do it at the rate of $2.00 every second.

He'll probably pay around $200 for a nice round of golf, but will be reimbursed $33,390 for that round.

Assuming he puts the federal maximum of 15% of his income into a tax deferred account (401k), his contributions will hit the federal cap of $9500 at 8:30 a.m. on January 1st.

If you were given a penny for every 10 dollars he made, you'd be living comfortably at $65,000 a year.

He'll make about $19.60 while watching the 100 meter dash in the Olympics, and about $15,600 during the Boston Marathon.

While the common person is spending about $20 for a meal in his trendy Chicago restaurant, he'll pull in about $5600.

This year, he'll make more than twice as much as all U.S. past presidents for all of their terms combined. Amazing isn't it?

However...
If Jordan saves 100% of his income for the next 450 years, he'll still have less than Bill Gates has today.

$$$ Game over. Nerd wins.

Brilliant. Seen at Board Of Wisdom.
0
A new product called the Pherlure Phermone Cologne promises that if you are among the lucky 75% you will experience an "increase in hugging, kissing, and sexual intercourse."


Curiosity First: How does this thing work? Well any chappie who has been following those numerous shows on sex on Discovery would know about this. Apparently it seems that people can smell some natural chemicals called phremones. Phremones are generated naturally by the human body. And by making women smell sweat from other women's underarms, (i know my blog is not kind on your tummy) some people have concluded that these Phremones are strong stuff. Strong enough to affect a woman's ovulation cycle. The products web page claims that women do not judge men on the basis of their looks (tell that to Brad Pitt) or their personality but on you guessed it a man's smell. They of course do not go around sniffing for these phremones but feel it as a gut feeling. I would love to hate this theory but it seems to explain why women are never able to clearly state what they want in a man.


Well after trying this out a few guys seem to have given their testimonials and they seem to be happy with all the attention they are getting. But of course it seems like fabricated stuff as more often than not the case is.

Like a good old neanderthal, i still believe that some good old chivalry can land you a woman. But you see, I am a neanderthal and this is for attracting human women.